Search This Blog

Friday, April 23, 2021

Ordinances Not Laws

  • Definitions.............................................................................................................7
    • Clean Hands Doctrine
    • Criminal Voyeurism
    • Invasion of Privacy
    • Tyranny
    • Vested Interest
  • Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 41
    • (b) (7)
  • Colorado Constitution...........................................................................................8, 9
    • Article II, Section 3 Inalienable Rights
    • Article II, Section 7 Security of Person and Property – Searches, Seizures, Warrants
    • Article II, Section 25 Due Process of Law
    • Article XXIX, Section 1 Purpose and Findings
    • Article XXIX, Section 2 Definitions
  • Colorado Revised Statutes(CRS).............................................................................10, 11, 12
    • 13-21-1403 - Civil action – definitions
    • 16-3-304 - Search warrants- contents
    • 18-1-603 - Complicity.
    • 18-2-201 - Conspiracy
    • 18-3-207 - Criminal extortion - aggravated extortion
    • 18-3-602 - Stalking - penalty - definitions - Vonnie’s law
    • 18-9-111 - Harassment.
  • US Constitution.....................................................................................................13
    • Article Six, Clause 2
    • Amendment IV
    • Amendment VI
    • Bill of Rights, Article Nine:
  • United States Code (USC)......................................................................................14
    • 18 USC 241 - Conspiracy against rights
    • 18 USC 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
    • 18 USC 2381 - Treason
  • American Jurisprudence.........................................................................................15
    • Book 16, Second edition, Section 97
    • Book 16, Second edition, Section. 177
    • Book 16, Second edition, Section 256

All cited laws, relevant Constitutional references, and definitions, listed above, are below the body of this document.

Consider this opinion of the Supreme Court:

The general misconception is that any statute, including city code, ordinance, or regulation, passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.

This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.

Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . . A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.

An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

— Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)

The word Law is a generic term that covers all acts, subordinates legislation, regulations, and ordinances. Laws are meant to maintain the public order. They are meant to deter people from engaging in criminal behaviors and, in general, help protect the people.

Those who enforce invalid laws are acting contrary to the US Constitution, the Colorado Constitution, and other valid laws. They are worse than any criminal, they rely on the respect the gun, badge, and uniform used to enjoy, immunity clauses, which prevent justice for their victims, and abuse the power of their position whenever possible.

If these conditions continue, society will become a power struggle between the people and those granted the authority to violate the very laws they have been entrusted to enforce. We, as a nation, are seeing this happen through out the united States.

First I want to make it clear – I understand the reasoning behind most oppressive and invalid city codes, ordinances, regulations, and statutes. However, the blatant and systematic violations of the US Constitution, the Colorado Constitution, Colorado Revised Statutes, federal laws, and the innate rights of the residents is not acceptable.

The Annual Budget, as of the year 2020, shows revenues, bolstering the city coffers, directly from the illegal activity described in this document. Fines and Forfeitures are imposed by the City’s Municipal Court on persons found to be in violation of the invalid City codes, ordinances, regulations, and or statutes, and subjected to a fine.

Year Amount ($) Change from Previous Year
2017 Actual 1,986,460
2018 Actual 2,170,103 9.24%
2019 Estimate 2,250,269 3.69%
2020 Adopted 2,290,500 1.79%

The poorest people in Pueblo are charged fines and fees they can ill afford to pay. Police officers and code enforcement officers commit the crime of extortion when they threaten the home owner with loss of property, income, and even jail time if they attempt to exercise their rights, protected by Colorado Constitution, Article II, Section 3, US Constitution Amendments 4, 5, 6, 14, and CRS 18-3-207.

To be true to my beliefs: nobody should complain unless they can provide a viable alternative to the current system. Which ultimately pushes lower income property owners into homelessness. Which cascades into even more problems for the city, residents, and already strained resources meant to assist the homeless.

My proposed solution requires code enforcement officers to work with property owners to help them clean up their properties without the need for involving the court, fines they can't pay, and ultimately property taxes that will ensure the city becomes the proud owner of an 'abated' property.

Negotiate an acceptable price for the 'clean up' crew and dump fees, with the city dump fee discount. Perhaps a couple hours a month, with no new trash or weeds being added to the property. Some clean ups may take months to complete depending on the income of the property owner.

The code enforcement department would be responsible for scheduling, with the property owner, which properties will be worked on and when. This system would at least, in part, reimburse the city for expenses incurred while actually helping residents clean up their properties, which would greatly benefit the city.

However, it appears the goal of the city is to over tax poor people to the point the city can justify illegally taking possession of properties! In violation of 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, Article II, Section 3 of the Colorado Constitution, the Fourth and Sixth Amendments of the US Constitution.(Why the 6th A? there is NO due process when enforcing invalid laws!)

As I sat listening to the public hearings on September 16, 2020, in Pueblo, CO, I learned why people think being offended is actionable. That is what our defunct justice system is teaching them. They get offended by something that is NONE of their business, report it, and watch the property owner struggle with fines and fees they can't afford, even if they are just as guilty as the person they reported.

It has become quite obvious the people, who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, are the ones who are perverting it to fit their agenda, by generating revenue through systematic abuse of power, placing themselves above the laws, codes, regulations, statutes, and ordinances they enforce on residents because someone was offended by the possessions stored on the private property of another. Specifically US Constitution Amendment 4, and Colorado Constitution Section 3, Section 7, and Section 25. When invalid laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, or statues are being enforced there is no proper or legal due process of law.

The 'dog and pony' show appeared to be a reiteration of the inappropriate Municipal court charges that created the foundation to justify the cost of abatement, which is nothing more than a socially acceptable term for theft under color of law. This whole system is designed to create a conspiracy, in violation of CRS 18-2-201, against the rights of citizens.

Code enforcement employees are nothing more than city government puppets enforcing invalid ordinances, codes, regulations, statutes, or laws on the residents. Telling the resident what property they can and cannot own and where and how they can store it! See Definition: Tyranny, Colorado Constitution Section 3, US Constitution Amendment 4, 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, and 18 USC 2381.

If the alleged search warrants used for the abatement process on the other properties was anything like the one I received, it is not a legal valid search warrant according to CRS 16-3-304; which means there was no legal or proper due process of law, the removal of property  from my property was blatant theft, under the color of law. I suspect it is the same for all the properties. Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 41 (b) (7)

Either the search warrant was a legal valid document and the code enforcement officer(s) willingly, knowingly, and maliciously defied a direct court order or it was not a valid search warrant – it can't be both!

The argument that it was a legal search warrant is proven fallacious when it is revealed the alleged search warrant required an inventory and safe keeping of any property seized, as directed by the judge who signed the alleged warrant, but was never done. This direct violation of an order from the court they purport to represent makes them thieves. This makes these officers FAR worse than any criminal on the street.

The invalid search warrant was nothing more than a tool used to intimidate, coerce, and threaten the property owner(s) with bodily harm and property damage if they did not comply with the unreasonable demands of the person presenting the fictitious paper.

Procedural due process rules are meant to protect persons not from the deprivation, but from the mistaken or unjustified deprivation of life, liberty, or property. Thus, the required elements of due process are those that minimize substantively unfair or mistaken deprivations by enabling persons to contest the basis upon which a government proposes to deprive them of protected interests.

A person commits the crime of extortion, CRS 18-3-207, when, in order to induce a person to do something against his or her will, and make a substantial threat against that person and or their property.

Threatening to forcibly remove someone and put them in jail because they are exercising their right to protect their property, Colorado Constitution Article II, section 7, is a credible threat of restraint, which would cause economic hardship, CRS 18-3-207, and the property owner could suffer bodily injury for attempting to prevent the unlawful act from being performed.

Under Colorado law, theft is defined broadly as it incorporates other crimes such as larceny, grand larceny, embezzlement, false pretenses, and shoplifting. A person commits theft in Colorado when he or she, intentionally and permanently deprive anything of value of another person.

Also when a person knowingly obtains, retains or controls the item; and does so without authorization or by threat or deception. Anyone can authorize another to commit an illegal act, it doesn't make commission of that act legal! The credible threat of theft of private property and the deception of presenting an invalid search warrant is, beyond any doubt, theft under the color of law!

Colorado theft laws also apply to those who didn't actually do the taking. For example, one can commit theft by knowingly receiving stolen property or by failing to promptly return property they were only allowed to hold for a certain period of time.

The crew member who sold the tires, mentioned in the itemized list, is guilty of knowingly, willingly, and maliciously profiting from possession of stolen property, the sale of stolen property, and theft under the color of law! While the police officers and code enforcement supervisor presented a show of force to prevent the homeowner from protecting their property. See Colorado Constitution Article II, Section 3, US Constitution Amendment 4, 18 USC 241, and 18 USC 242.

A truly horrible discovery was when I realized the entire city government, including the mayor, city council, city attorney's, judges, chief of police, and police officers are all complicit in every crime mentioned in this document. See CRS 18-1-603.

The city attorney mentioned a citizens right to privacy, and claimed that taking pictures over a wooden privacy fence is 'legal' as long as the person taking the pictures is on a public right of way. This is indisputably false. Taking pictures over a privacy fence is stalking, invasion of privacy, and harassment. See CRS 18-3-602 and CRS 18-9-111

The Supreme Court has ruled that there is a limited constitutional right of privacy based on a number of provisions in the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments. This includes a right to privacy from government* surveillance into an area where a person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy".

*This includes local, county, state and federal.

A conspiracy, see CRS 18-2-201, takes place when a protected anonymous complaint is reported to the code enforcement department of the police department. The conspiracy continues when a code enforcement officer is dispatched to the address of the complaint. This system violates Amendment 6 of the US Constitution by removing the right to question the original accuser. There is also the possibility of the complainant being guilty of the same crime they are reporting of another. See the clean hands doctrine. The admission of hearsay evidence sometimes results in depriving defendants of their right to confront opposing witnesses, as the Supreme Court observed in Delaney v. United States, 263 U.S. 586 (1924).

Since city codes, ordinances, regulations, and statutes are NOT laws there is no due process when a person is charged for a violation in a civil or criminal court.

To add insult to injury, code enforcement officers continue to contact property owners, with every intention of alarming them by threatening them with bodily injury and/or property damage and intimidation which creates fear of property theft! See CRS 18-9-111

Definitions:

tyranny - oppressive or unjustly severe government on the part of any ruler.

  • vested interest
    • n. A right or title, as to present or future possession of an estate, that can be conveyed to another.
    • n. A fixed right granted to an employee under a pension plan.
    • n. A special interest in protecting or promoting that which is to one's own personal advantage.
  • invasion of privacy
    • noun - an encroachment upon the right to be let alone or to be free from publicity.
    • An invasion of privacy happens when anyone takes images of property without permission, or views property they do not own, have control of, or any vested interest in.
  • clean hands doctrine
    • n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong) in regard to the subject matter of his/her claim. His/her activities not involved in the legal action can be abominable since it is considered irrelevant. As an affirmative defense (positive response) a defendant might claim the plaintiff (party suing him/her) has a "lack of clean hands" or "violates the clean hands doctrine" because the plaintiff has misled the defendant or has done something wrong regarding the matter under consideration. Example: A former partner sues on a claim that he was owed money on a consulting contract with the partnership when he left, but the defense states that the plaintiff (party suing) has tried to get customers from the partnership by spreading untrue stories about the remaining partner's business practices.
    • The criminal voyeurism statute of some states cover "a place where [one] would have a reasonable expectation of privacy", meaning:
    • i. A place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that his or her undressing was being photographed or filmed by another; or
    • ii. A place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance. - such as a yard enclosed by a privacy fence.

Colorado Constitution, Article II

Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons have certain natural, essential and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; and of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.

Section 7. Security of person and property searches seizures warrants. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes and effects, from unreasonable searches and seizures; and no warrant to search any place or seize any person or things shall issue without describing the place to be searched, or the person or thing to be seized, as near as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation reduced to writing.

Section 25. Due process of law. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.

Article XXIX, Section 1 Purpose and Findings

(1) The people of the state of Colorado hereby find and declare that:

(a) The conduct of public officers, members of the general assembly, local government officials, and government employees must hold the respect and confidence of the people;

(b) They shall carry out their duties for the benefit of the people of the state;

(c) They shall, therefore, avoid conduct that is in violation of their public trust or that creates a justifiable impression among members of the public that such trust is being violated;

(d) Any effort to realize personal financial gain through public office other than compensation provided by law is a violation of that trust; and

(e) To ensure propriety and to preserve public confidence, they must have the benefit of specific standards to guide their conduct, and of a penalty mechanism to enforce those standards.

(2) The people of the state of Colorado also find and declare that there are certain costs associated with holding public office and that to ensure the integrity of the office, such costs of a reasonable and necessary nature should be born by the state or local government.

Article XXIX, Section 2 Definitions

As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) "Government employee" means any employee, including independent contractors, of the state executive branch, the state legislative branch, a state agency, a public institution of higher education, or any local government, except a member of the general assembly or a public officer.

(2) "Local government" means county or municipality.

(3) "Local government official" means an elected or appointed official of a local government but does not include an employee of a local government.

(4) "Person" means any individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, limited liability company, partnership, labor organization, association, political party, committee, or other legal entity.

(5) "Professional lobbyist" means any individual who engages himself or herself or is engaged by any other person for pay or for any consideration for lobbying. "Professional lobbyist" does not include any volunteer lobbyist, any state official or employee acting in his or her official capacity, except those designated as lobbyists as provided by law, any elected public official acting in his or her official capacity, or any individual who appears as counsel or advisor in an adjudicatory proceeding.

(6) "Public officer" means any elected officer, including all statewide elected officeholders, the head of any department of the executive branch, and elected and appointed members of state boards and commissions. "Public officer" does not include a member of the general assembly, a member of the judiciary, any local government official, or any member of a board, commission, council or committee who receives no compensation other than a per diem allowance or necessary and reasonable expenses.

Colorado Revised Statutes:

18-2-201. - Conspiracy.

(a)A person commits conspiracy to commit an offense if, with the intent to promote or facilitate its commission, he or she agrees with another person or persons that they, or one (1) or more of them, will engage in conduct which constitutes an offense defined by the ordinances of the City or which constitutes an attempt to commit an offense defined by the ordinances of the City, or he or she agrees to aid the other person or persons in the planning or commission of such an offense or of an attempt to commit such offense.

(b)Conspiracy to commit an offense is a Class 2 municipal offense.

18-1-603. - Complicity.

A person is legally accountable as principal for the behavior of another constituting a criminal offense if, with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense, he or she aids, abets, advises, or encourages the other person in planning or committing the offense.

18-9-111. - Harassment.

(a)A person commits the offense of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he or she:

(1)In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person;

(2)Follows a person in or about a public place;

(3)Initiates communication with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, telephone network, data network, text message, instant message, computer, computing network or computer system, in a manner intended to harass or threaten bodily injury or property damage, or makes any comment, request, suggestion or proposal by telephone, computer, computing network or computer system which is obscene;

(4)Makes a telephone call or causes a telephone to ring repeatedly, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate conversation;

(5)Makes repeated communications at inconvenient hours that invade the privacy of another and interfere in the use and enjoyment of another's home or private residence or other private property;

(6)Repeatedly insults, taunts, challenges or communicates with another in a manner intended to cause a reasonable person to feel fear, intimidation or annoyance; or

(7)Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him or her to physical contact.

(b)As used in this Section, unless the context otherwise requires, obscene means a patently offensive description of ultimate sexual acts or solicitation to commit ultimate sexual acts, whether or not said ultimate sexual acts are normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus or excretory functions.

(c)Any act prohibited by Paragraph (a)(3) of this Section may be deemed to have occurred or to have been committed at the place at which the telephone call, electronic mail or other electronic communication was either made or received. Any acts prohibited by Paragraph (a)(4) of this Section may be deemed to have occurred or to have been committed at the place at which the telephone call was either made or received.

(d)Harassment is a Class 1 municipal offense.

16-3-304 Search warrants- contents

(1) If the judge is satisfied that grounds for the application exist or that there is probable cause to believe that such grounds exist, he shall issue a search warrant, which shall:

(a) Identify or describe, as nearly as may be, the premises, person, place, or thing to be searched;

(b) Identify or describe, as nearly as may be, the property to be searched for, seized, or inspected;

(c) State the grounds or probable cause for its issuance; and

(d) State the names of the persons whose affidavits or testimony have been taken in support thereof.

(2) The search warrant may also contain such other and further orders as the judge deems necessary to comply with the provisions of a statute, charter, or ordinance, or to provide for the custody or delivery to the proper officer of any property seized under the warrant, or otherwise to accomplish the purposes of the warrant.

(3) Unless the court otherwise directs, every search warrant authorizes the officer executing the same:

(a) To execute and serve the warrant at any time; and

(b) To use and employ such force as is reasonably necessary in the performance of the duties commanded by the warrant.

18-3-207. Criminal extortion - aggravated extortion

(1) A person commits criminal extortion if:

(a) The person, without legal authority and with the intent to induce another person against that other person’s will to perform an act or to refrain from performing a lawful act, makes a substantial threat to confine or restrain, cause economic hardship or bodily injury to, or damage the property or reputation of, the threatened person or another person; and

(b) The person threatens to cause the results described in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) by:

(I) Performing or causing an unlawful act to be performed; or

(II) Invoking action by a third party, including, but not limited to, the state or any of its political subdivisions, whose interests are not substantially related to the interests pursued by the person making the threat.

(1.5) A person commits criminal extortion if the person, with the intent to induce another person against that other person’s will to give the person money or another item of value, threatens to report to law enforcement officials the immigration status of the threatened person or another person.

(2) A person commits aggravated criminal extortion if, in addition to the acts described in subsection (1) of this section, the person threatens to cause the results described in paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section by means of chemical, biological, or harmful radioactive agents, weapons, or poison.

(3) For the purposes of this section, “substantial threat” means a threat that is reasonably likely to induce a belief that the threat will be carried out and is one that threatens that significant confinement, restraint, injury, or damage will occur.

(4) Criminal extortion, as described in subsections (1) and (1.5) of this section, is a class 4 felony. Aggravated criminal extortion, as described in subsection (2) of this section, is a class 3 felony.

18-3-602. Stalking - penalty - definitions - Vonnie’s law

(1) A person commits stalking if directly, or indirectly through another person, the person knowingly:

(a) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, or places under surveillance that person, a member of that person’s immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship; or

(b) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly makes any form of communication with that person, a member of that person’s immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship, regardless of whether a conversation ensues;

13-21-1403. Civil action - definitions

(1) In this section, unless the context otherwise requires:

(a) “Harm” means physical harm, economic harm, and emotional distress whether or not accompanied by physical or economic harm.

(b) “Private” means:

(I) Created or obtained under circumstances in which the depicted individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy; or

(II) Made accessible through theft, bribery, extortion, fraud, false pretenses, voyeurism, or exceeding authorized access to an account, message, file, device, resource, or property.

US Constitution

Article Six, Clause 2:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

(The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution)

Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Sixth Amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Bill of Rights, Article Nine:

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Federal Laws:

18 USC 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

18 USC 242: Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 2381

In the presents of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.

American Jurisprudence Book 16: Constitution Law Section 16Am Jur 2d Section 97:

"Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property." Bary v. United States - 273 US 128 "Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary"

American Jurisprudence Book 16, 2 edition, Section 177 late 2d, Section 256:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Protests, Riots, and Terrorism

To everyone who still thinks the looting, burning, and murdering happening in major cities right now have to do with the outrage for the death of a 'black' man at the hands of a 'white' man:
  • Protesting is a peaceful event that gets the governments attention. A protest is generally secondary to explaining your position, why you believe something is 'wrong', and a proposition for correcting the situation.
  • Rioting is looting innocent businesses, disrupting society, blocking streets. Also, defined as a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd.
  • Domestic terrorism means activities with the following three characteristics:
    1. Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
    2. Appear intended* (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; or
      • (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
      • (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping;
    3. and Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
FBI Terrorism Definition

*: an intention, which threatening to 'go to white urban areas' and loot and burn or 'take back what is yours', actually is - doesn't mean the people who are your intended victims are actually intimidated! 

If you think looting, burning, and murdering is sending a clear message to society/government you would be correct! That message is: you are a violent psychopath! Which provides grounds for justification for the police to murder even more people during 'encounters'! By the way you are proving that George Floyd WAS a violent drug addicted criminal! 

The protest of the death of George Floyd ended days ago - when it turned in to rioting that ended when it turned into domestic terrorism when business owners attempting to protect their only means of income were beaten to death by cowardly thugs who only want to destroy what others have created/built, most likely because they have no desire to see others succeed because they are such failures!


The Fake Truther Store

I realize this particular page is nearly six years old, 9/6/2015, but doing research on an unrelated matter I got side tracked and read it for a good laugh!

Let's start with the url – the truther store – really?? That publishes absolute false narratives!! I copied and pasted the original, and decided to ask the obvious questions:

1. The Department of Homeland Security and other privately held government contractors, such as the Federal Reserve and the Postal Security Service, have not purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammunition, to include hollow point rounds. They also have not purchased over 2000 Mine Resistant Armored Personnel (MRAPS) for domestic use, or tens of thousands of M4 Carbine semi-automatic rifles.

Response: Postal Security Service? Had to look that one up and come to the conclusion it is a typo of Mail Security Center, the new politically correct name for the United States Postal Service or USPS. However, US Postal Service Announces Giant Ammo Purchase, and hundreds of other reliable websites, including wnd and newsmax, reported the same story.

I am inclined to believe it is true, many government agencies purchased weapons, ammunition, and hired people for their private army. FEMA refurbished emergency camps to be "political re-education camps". FEMA also purchased enough guillotines to eliminate 10 million people per day. It was reported they were being stored in warehouses in Oregon, Washington, Texas, and Pennsylvania, with the millions of plastic coffins they purchased.

As of September 2020, $1.6 Billion in surplus military gear has been purchased by local police departments across the nation. Which I find far more worrisome than knowing a government agency has purchased weapons and ammunition. Apparently the USPS didn't order MRAPS but Uganda did!

2. There are no specifically built "FEMA camps" designed to house domestic or foreign refugees in the event of disaster or financial collapse.

Response: You are correct the FEMA camps are not to house domestic or foreign refugees in the event of a disaster or financial collapse - they are to hold political dissidents, aka conservatives and republicans, who will be rounded up for political re-education, if the democrats can't get their socialist/communist ideology shoved down the throats of the American public.

3. The government does not, and has not staged "FALSE FLAG" events in order to create "PROBLEM/REACTION/SOLUTION" style incidents which justify the necessary curbing of rights of private citizens in the interest of "SECURITY".

Really??

Sandy Hook, a defunct elementary school shot to pieces, to "scare" Americans into relinquishing their guns and generating numerous bills which violate the Second Amendment.

The 'muslim" non-event in California? 

How about the government orchestrated disaster of 9/11? To "prove" America needs to send troops to get Osama Bin Laden, because he has WMD's, and the creation of the wholly unConstitutional Patriot act?

The Boston bombing, to show Americans they are not safe in America, full of fake news stories, including the death of the brother, who minutes later got up off the road and into a car with blacked out windows?

Fast and Furious, the obama administration sold guns and ammunition to the Mexican drug cartel to increase violence along the US/Mexico border? Many American border patrol agents were murdered with those guns!

I am sure there are MANY more! Follow the money, do your own research and stop believing anything main stream media tells you!

4. The government has not coordinated the recent influx of underage illegal immigrants at many points on our border with Mexico in order to push an "IMMIGRATION REFORM AGENDA".

Response: Really?? Then why was the false President Soetoro, aka obama, PAID for every juvenile who came across the border? Why have democrats been screeching about immigration reform for DECADES?

Why have democrats been coaching invaders, aka illegal immigrants, to say the "right" things when they "request asylum"?

5. The Federal government and state legislatures are not fabricating artificial points of contention among its citizenry by passing legislation to protect the civil and legal rights of homosexuals and transgendered citizens.

Response: Fabricating artificial points of contention? The Federal government, state legislatures, and most politicians demand heterosexuals "play along" with the delusions of members of the LGBTQ community, if that isn't meant to fabricate artificial points of contention then why?

LGBTQ members have taken a step above blacks for unequal preference on job applications to ensure every work place is "diverse", to meet federal diversity guidelines.

LGBTQ business owners are allowed to refuse services to heterosexual customers but are supported by 'laws', courts, and politicians when they sue because a Christian heterosexual refuses them services.

6. There is NOT an international child sex prostitution ring. Children are not being exploited for any reason, and are not being abused in any way, are not being used for purposes of BRIBERY or BLACKMAIL. The children are just fine.

Response: Then why was there a need for democraps to create a 'keep families together act'?

Yea, the island owned by Epstein just happened to have cages filed with small children, pregnant teenage girls, and boys who had been sexually molested. It is obvious the women who passed through those cells produced them all. No child has ever been abducted, molested, and killed by a stranger. Yes, I am being sarcastic.

The Clinton's have a LONG history of purchasing children for sexual gratification. Biden's proclivities for immature sex partners is well documented. But, it could be pure coincidence, that like the Clintons, Biden also owned an island very near pedo island.

Too bad there isn't someone who knows about the world sex trafficking of children, like maybe some one who worked closely with Epstein, or right, Ghislaine Maxwell!

There is a reason Epstein's plane was named the Lolita Express! Many people have know it for YEARS!

7. The United States government does not, and has never in the past, SOLD OR GIVEN weapons and ammunition to any party or group affiliated with the enemies of the State, or any rebel faction who opposes any enemy of the United States.

Response: Fast and furious was just a myth? A fabrication to make Soetoro look bad? Say it isn't so, the whistle blowers wouldn't have fabricated that kind of evidence, would they? The border patrol agents just happened to die from random gun fire from their co-workers? Wonder how the bullets traced back to American military surplus? How could the Mexican drug cartel have gotten ahold of them?

8. The United States government does not, and has never in the past, TRAFFICKED OR SOLD DRUGS within or without American borders or controlled waters.

Response: I thought it was common knowledge that the US government is the largest drug dealer on the planet! Isn't that why the Bush administration assigned American troops to guard poppy fields in the middle east? Research shows the Bush family actually OWN the land those poppies are growing on. Is that why the report of the ship, filled with drugs, owned by McConell's wife's family was hushed up so quickly?

9. The United States government has never OBFUSCATED OR FABRICATED INFORMATION used to justify the involvement of our armed forces in any military engagement, past or present.

Response: Isn't that exactly what the CIA, FBI, and many other government agencies do? What?? You mean is was just happenstance that our Navy moved ALL the destroyers into Pearl Harbor? 

I bet you don't believe the Navy is manipulating the weather, even after they admitted it! Not just the weather, they can create earthquakes, tsunami's, and all manner of earthly calamities!

10. There are no individual or collective human beings on the planet who have designs and plans of "WORLD DOMINATION". There are no plans to implement a "NEW WORLD ORDER". There are no plans for "GLOBAL POPULATION CONTROL," in any form, by any group or individual.

Response: Tell that to the Rothschilds, Bilderbergers, Cavendishs, Medicis, Hanover, Habsburg, Krupp, Plantagenet, Rockefeller, Romanov, Sinclair, Warburgs, and Windsors. Go read Agenda 21 and realize it is real, it is true, and it is happening, these families have invested more than 60 years in the slow take over of the world.

11. There is no plan inherent in the current economic paradigm of capitalism to intentionally inflate the value of money to the point of uselessness. The central banking system made up of the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank DOES NOT have a globalist social agenda, and has no intention to cause worldwide economic downturn by controlling the money that we use to execute our day to day life.

Response: Anyone who believes this is delusional, blind or plain naïve! The federal reserve is a PRIVATE bank owned by the afore mentioned elite families, who have previously admitted to having a world depopulation agenda. They will keep those who can be of benefit to them, everyone else is obsolete.

12. The leadership of the United States does not believe that in order to establish security for it’s citizens, it is necessary to limit freedoms and liberties. There is NO ATTACK on the rights of citizens as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, or the Constitution as a whole.

Response: Then why do they keep doing it? The first amendment, freedom of speech, is only allowed when you pay for a proper license to exercise your right to freedom of speech, unless you are of a 'minority' race, funded by the democrats, or want to infuriate you fellow human beings! Every 'freedom' in the bill of rights has in some way been monetized, limited, or infringed!

13. There is no movement by the Democratic Senate to repeal the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, and replace it with a much longer, and much less "FREE" version of it. That was an internet hoax played on the people of this country by Ted Cruz and it’s comedic leadership.

Response: The democrat politicians want to completely destroy the US Constitution. They have admitted it, they would rather see this country burn than thrive! Ted Cruz? Oh right, Raphael Cruz, who calls himself Ted, because he doesn't want people to know his father is a Cuban; the person married to someone who literally helped draft the document that will dissolve the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence to install the New World Order, ya right!! LOL

14. Economic markets are established by the will of the consumer, and fulfilled by manufacturers. The prices of goods and commodities are set by supply and demand ONLY and are not manipulated in any way by governments, banks, or multi-national corporations.

Response: Not manipulated? What do you call it when manufacturers are PAID, by the government, to NOT produce goods and commodities?

The 'oil shortage' that caused the gas crisis in the 70's was imaginary?

The government pulling currency out of circulation in the late 1920's and early 1930's didn't cause the stock market to crash or the depression that followed? If that isn't manipulation of the markets, please enlighten us as to what would/could be called manipulation?

15. The government of the United States, particularly its legislature, ARE NOT influenced by groups of people or corporations to create laws and regulations that are in the interest of their profit.

Response: You think those bribes the politicians take don't influence their bad decisions and acts of treason, to the determent of the American people?

16. The leadership of the United States government, or it’s states, ARE NOT corruptible by foreign, monetary, or political interests, and DO NOT receive compensation in the form of cash, gifts, or high positions in private industry.

Response: Is that why Biden, as vice president, withheld America aid to the Ukraine until they fired the attorney investigating his son, quid pro quo, then bragged about it! Yes, EVERY crime the democraps have attempted to charge Trump with they actually committed!

Then you tell me how a politician getting $175,00 a year from the American tax payer manage to become millionaires in months!

17. The US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency have never engaged in the inciting of uprisings of a foreign populous, nor have they ever installed a proxy leader who is amenable to the American interests of "POLITICAL INFLUENCE".

Response: Wonder what life is like believing everyone is honest, truthful, and actually doing what is in the best interest of the people of the united States?! It has been proven many times over the American alphabet agencies have placed rulers, they can control, in power in foreign countries.

18. "OIL" has never been, and never will be, a singular cause for war. It has never been a primary cause for war. The production of energy for uses of locomotion and electricity by the consumption of oil are not important enough reasons to kill or be killed. The governments of the world understand this.

Response: Why not? Human fight over the dumbest things! Do you have an alternative reason for the stupidity of every war that has ever taken place? Land? Power? Oil? Control? They are all excuses to start a war!

19. All of the things that seem to be happening, in the way they seem to be happening, are not happening. Rest assured that the interest of the common man are paramount to those elite who control the systems and machinations of this world. What you are witnessing is the struggle for our good leaders to cope with an increasingly complex and dangerous world. What is done by our leaders is in the best interest of the ENTIRE human race, regardless of social standing and station, economic worth, ability to produce, political affiliation, sexual and gender identity, race, creed, color, or religious belief.

Response: Those elite who control the systems and machinations of this world?? I thought you said you didn't believe there were elite who want to take over the world and no New World Order, number 10. But everyone who thinks there is evil in the world which does not want the best for the common man is delusional? In what dream could anyone believe those in power are truly concerned about anyone other than themselves, their families, and their bank accounts?? Tell that to the people of Venezuela!

Democrat will not rest until America is in the same financial position!