Government Overreach or Regulation

The false POTUS, from 2008 to 2016, signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010 to increase the number of Americans covered by health insurance, and to decrease the cost of healthcare.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) The Supreme Court held 5-4 that the individual mandate was legitimate, because it was in essence a tax, and struck down the provision that would withhold funds for states which did not expand the program.
However, the bigger issues are never mentioned -

1. Does the federal, state, county, or local government have the power to demand the people engage in financial transactions (contract) with a third party?
2. When, where, and how did the 'government' acquire this power?
3. IF the federal government has the power mentioned above, is it reasonable to believe they can also demand citizens purchase vehicles, to legitimize the requirement to purchase 'car' insurance?
4. IF the federal government has the powers mentioned above, is it reasonable to believe they can also 'regulate' what types, brands, and/or design of vehicle, or any other product, can be made available to the people?
5. IF the federal government has the powers mentioned above, is it reasonable to believe the government can also demand the people only buy 'healthy' food, by removing all products the government deems as 'unhealthy' from the retail market?
6. Unless the government removes all private health care companies and only offers government subsidized healthcare isn't this 'tax' a violation of free commerce?
7. IF, the affordable care act is a tax*, shouldn't all insurance premiums go directly to a government entity?
8. IF, the affordable care act is a tax*, when, how and why did the government give a private industry, health care insurance, the right, power, and/or authority to collect payments for services rendered as taxes?
9. Citizens of America have the right to contract! That is, hire someone for a specific job, task, or to provide a service! They also have the right to refuse to contract without fear of fines, penalties, or violating restrictive government policies! This is the definition of government overreach, violating the peoples right to refuse to contract, and further financially harming them with mandatory fines for exercising that right!
10. Since the government requires people to have health insurance, and have called it a tax, does that mean ALL 'services' received by a consumer are 'taxes', or just insurance, or just health insurance?
11. IF health insurance, or any other 'service' type product purchased by a consumer, is a 'tax' - WHY are they allowed and/or required to charge and collect 'sales', or any other, tax on the transaction? Isn't that taxing a tax?
12. The Constitution** gives Congress the power to regulate commerce***. Where does the Constitution mention creating a financial burden on the people?

When 'regulating' commerce goes to far it becomes totalitarianism! Regulating commerce, in the old sense of the word, should be restricted to ensuring 'fair' trade between the states, foreign countries with the united State of America, and with Indian tribes, not the kind or type services offered, the products sold, how much they produced, manufactured, or have in storage, especially when the government, either by design or accident, violate the people's rights! As we have seen, flooding the market with a variety of products, especially vehicles, does not drive the price down, the manufacturing costs up, or otherwise 'damage' the economy, the people, the state, or the federal government.

*Tax

law refers to the rules made by the government to collect revenues. Taxes can be imposed on individuals, businesses, corporations, and other legal entities.

**Article I, Section 8, Clause 3

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

***Commerce.

The exchange of goods, products, or any type of Personal Property. Trade and traffic carried on between different peoples or states and its inhabitants, including not only the purchase, sale, and exchange of commodities but also the instrumentalities, agencies, and means by which business is accomplished.

Regardless of how the government or any other entity tries to twist the word commerce to fit their desired narrative: Commerce is the necessary actions that keep businesses in business, i.e. purchasing wholesale or manufacturing products for retail sale such as the USA contracting with foreign countries for goods and services and the exchange there of for the benefit of the respective countries, manufacturers producing products for retail sale - from the manufacturer/producer to a retailer NOT from the retailer to the consumer! Employees do not engage in commerce when they exchange their time and effort for benefits and/or monetary gain - that is a barter - and NOT subject to taxes! The exchange of paper bills and coins or an electronic transaction is a barter; instead of working or exchanging something else of equal or greater value for the item!

How Law Fails

The following case were found at saylordotorg.githun.io

Generally a defendant’s status in society is not a criminal act, such as being an alcoholic or a drug addict. Status is who the defendant is, not what the defendant does. Similar to punishment for an involuntary act, when the government punishes an individual for status, it is essentially targeting that individual for circumstances that are outside his or her control. This punishment may be cruel and unusual pursuant to the Eighth Amendment if it is disproportionate to the defendant’s behavior.

In Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the US Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional as cruel and unusual punishment pursuant to the Eighth Amendment to punish an individual for the status of being a drug addict—even if the drugs to which the defendant is addicted are illegal. 

The Court compared drug addiction to an illness, such as leprosy or venereal disease. Punishing a defendant for being sick not only is inhumane but also does not specifically deter, similar to a punishment for an involuntary act.

In contrast, the case of Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968), the US Supreme Court upheld the defendant’s conviction for “drunk in public,” in spite of the defendant’s status as an alcoholic. The Court held that it is difficult but not impossible for an alcoholic to resist the urge to drink, so the behavior the statute criminalized was voluntary. 

Also, the Court ruled that the state has an interest in treating alcoholism and preventing alcohol-related crimes that could injure the defendant and others. Pursuant to Powell, statutes that criminalize voluntary acts that arise from status are constitutional under the Eighth Amendment.

If the defendant can control the actions at issue in spite of his or her status, the defendant’s conduct can be constitutionally criminalized and punished pursuant to the Eighth Amendment. This is where the law fails to equally prosecute or protect, respectively, the perpetrator and the victims.

While it is difficult, but not impossible, for a drug addict to resist the urge to enter an altered state of mind by using drugs. It is a conscious and voluntary choice before they facilitate the introduction of drug(s) into their body. Regardless of whether that introduction is oral, injected, smoked, 'snorted', or by any other means. 

If it was impossible to resist the urge to use drugs nobody would seek treatment; let alone successfully complete a drug treatment program. 

Alcoholism is also a treatable illness which is not always 'controllable' by the alcoholic. The State should also have an interest in treating drug addicts and preventing drug addicted crimes, which generally include promoting the sale and use of illicit drugs, theft, burglary, breaking and entering, and other serious crimes which could, and often do, injure the drug addict and others, but not at the expense of innocent taxpayers who are not involved in the crime or the addicted perpetrator!

Pueblo Coordinated Election

Coming ballot issues up for vote on November 5, 2019:

What voter in their right mind would EVER vote for something like this?

 “....a voter-approved revenue change that may be collected, retained, and spent by the county consistent with this ballot issue but without statutory or constitutional limitation or condition, including article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, section 29-1-301, Colorado revised statutes, or ANY other law?”

EVERY 'ballot issue' has this paragraph attached! When you ask voters to knowingly, willingly, and ILLEGALLY violate the document that was meant to RESTRAIN government, not allow it to arbitrarily grant itself MORE power, you know you are committing treason!

Ballot Issue No. 1A Vote: NO

By your own admission you are wanting to violate the Colorado Constitution yet AGAIN! This time you want NO restrictions on where and how you 'spend' those funds. As a constituent and registered voter I say absolutely NOT! This sounds like a ponzi scheme, with tax payer funds, to pocket the money and NOT be accountable for it! Section 20 already states, in part “ Revenue collected, kept, or spent illegally since four full fiscal years before a suit is filed shall be refunded with 10% annual simple interest from the initial conduct. “ admitting the state/county/local government(s) already knows they are, have been, and/or will in the future 'illegally' spend tax payer funds!

Ballot Issue No. 1B: Vote: NO

Increase taxes on marijuana (cannabis)? Really?? We, the residents of Pueblo, have already been asked/refunded the EXCESS tax you collected on 'marijuana' sales because you can't keep your accounting straight. Within this ballot the authors admit they are NOT going to fund more scholarships and put the increased funds toward the over crowding problem at the jail. NO, more taxes until YOU can spend the already collected funds on projects YOU said needed to be funded with the previous tax increases! Having the LOWEST 'marijuana' tax rates in the state is a GOOD thing! As for the over crowding in the Pueblo county jail or the Pueblo city jail, maybe the law makers should STOP making laws that violate the citizens rights, while aiding and abetting the criminal illegals in this city/state, and stop arresting citizens for disobeying those unConstitutional restrictions you want to call laws! Article X, Section 20, of the Colorado Constitution, already states, in part “Revenue collected, kept, or spent illegally since four full fiscal years before a suit is filed shall be refunded with 10% annual simple interest from the initial conduct.” admitting the state/county/local government(s) already knows they are, have been, and/or will in the future 'illegally' spend tax payer funds! Now you want remove the ability for the citizens to hold the city accountable for violating ANY law!

Ballot Issue No. 4A Vote: NO

WHY do the schools have such HUGE debts? Issues at the schools should have been addressed BEFORE they became 'critical' issues! The fact that the schools are in debt, needing 'critical' repairs, and requesting MORE tax payer funds tells me that previous funding was NOT used appropriately!Creating a Citizen's Bond Advisory Committee, aka wasting more tax payer funds, to 'ensure transparency of spending associated with the bond issue' is an admission the city has, in the past, and will in the future misappropriate funds if they are not carefully watched.

Ballot Issue No. 4B Vote NO

For the same reasons as Ballot Issue No. 4A!

Ballot Issue No. 5A Vote: NO

Once bonds for schools are issued there is NO end to the 'payments' or the requested increase in taxes. Schools, politicians, city council members, and state representatives see a money pit. When they run out of money, because the requested amount is NEVER enough, they turn to the residents and request more and more and more... with no end in sight.

Ballot Issue No. 6A Vote: NO

Pueblo West, wants to be their own city/town, and now want the entire state to raise taxes to fund a fire department for them?! The entire state of Colorado should not be investing in ONE small development! Another 'exception' to the Colorado Constitution, imagine that! You want the residents of the city of Pueblo to vote on 'issues' that will affect the ENTIRE state – what kind of garbage are you trying to sell? 

Ballot Issue No. 6B Vote: NO

All taxes are just one of the many ways governments punish the residents of a city, county, state, and/or nation for being a citizen! You are being VERY serious about NOT being restrained by ANY law while punishing the citizens for MINOR infractions of the unConstitutional restrictions YOU want to call laws!

Ballot Issue 6C Vote: NO

Again you want to knowingly, willingly, and illegally violate the Colorado Constitution. Since you can't/won't/don't operate within the parameters of the restriction set forth in the Constitution maybe it is time for ALL residents of Colorado to rethink the elected officials we have 'running' the various governments!

Since the citizens/residents of Pueblo voted NO on a previous ballot issue to allow “a voter-approved revenue change that may be collected, retained, and spent by the county consistent with this ballot issue but without statutory or constitutional limitation or condition, including article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, section 29-1-301, Colorado revised statutes, or ANY other law.” you think it is appropriate to put it on ALL ballot issues?

NO means NO!

The Deterioration of Nancy Pelosi

Oct 2010 - Pelosi Admits the dems have and are working their plans to take over the government! Nancy Pelosi Makes a Fool of Herself on Charlie Rose's Show!















March 2017 Nancy Pelosi utters gibberish, slurs statements, repeats words! it isn't what she is saying as much as it is how she is saying it! Stumbling over words, repeating thoughts, strange facial spasms!














June 2017 Nancy Pelosi confused about time of day, forgets latest Russia accusations -- 6 minutes later! She makes a claim Trump is attacking medicaid - which is dangerous to children and other living things!

She claims Russia hacked the American election in 2016 and 21 states were compromised - then can't remember what she said!

She claims America has to 'pussyfoot' around when it comes to sanctions on Russia!

Oct 2017 Nancy Pelosi face spasms mar speech; utters gibberish! Symptoms from dementia -While symptoms of dementia can vary greatly, at least two of the following core mental functions must be significantly impaired to be considered dementia:

Memory
Communication and language
Ability to focus and pay attention
Reasoning and judgment
Visual perception

January 2019, Pelosi botches words, suffers face spasms, confuses Dems and GOP

Scary Sh!t

How long have the global elite been trying to over throw America? I remember in the mid to late 70's and early 80's hearing 'rumors' about a New World Order, a Globalist government, and 'concentration' camps for those that can not be converted.

I was young and didn't think much about it. Now, after surviving the horrible regime of the false potus, I have started attempting to debunk some of the 'conspiracy' theories, as they were called back then.

Where to start? Which came first? As I research I may have to rearrange my data into chronological order!

Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments. The Council does this by convening meetings; conducting a wide-ranging Studies program; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal covering international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; maintaining a diverse membership; sponsoring Independent Task Forces; and providing up to-date information about the world and U.S. foreign policy on the Council’s website, www.cfr.org.

Josef Mengle - Angel of Death 1935

One of the first methodical studies on trauma-based mind control was conducted by Josef Mengele, a physician working in Nazi concentration camps. He initially gained notoriety for being one of the SS physicians who supervised the selection of arriving prisoners, determining who was to be killed and who was to become a forced laborer. However, he is mostly known for performing grisly human experiments on camp inmates, including children, for which Mengele was called the “Angel of Death”.
Mengele is infamous for his sordid human experiments on concentration camps prisoners, especially on twins. A part of his work that is rarely mentioned however, is his research on mind control. Much of his research in this field was confiscated by the Allies and is still classified to this day.

MK-ULTRA was brought to light by various commissions in the 1970s, including the Rockefeller Commission of 1975. Although it is claimed that the CIA stopped such experiments after these commissions, some whistle-blowers have come forth stating that the project simply went “underground” and Monarch Programming has become the classified successor of MK-ULTRA.
BETA is referred to as “sexual” programming (slaves). This programming eliminates all learned moral convictions and stimulates the primitive instinct, devoid of inhibitions. “Cat” alters may come out at this level. Known as Kitten programming, it is the most visible kind of programming as some female celebrities, models, actresses, and singers have been subjected to this kind of programming. In popular culture, clothing with feline prints often denotes Kitten programming. - Now it makes sense that the hollyweird elite are unhinged nut jobs! Do more research on this - there is a LOT of information on the internet, thanks to the FOIA!

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." - Paul Warburg, speaking to the United States Senate, February 17, 1950

Adjusting Emergency Preparedness Assignments to Organizational and Functional Changes in Federal Departments and Agencies
June 11, 1976 - EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921

All hail the New World Order

President George Herbert Walker Bush - September 11, 1990
A Speech by George H. W. Bush, President of the U.S.A. Given to a joint session of the United States Congress, Washington D.C. on 11 September 1990.
"Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, members of the Congress, distinguished guests, fellow Americans, thank very much for that warm welcome. We gather tonight, witness to events in the Persian Gulf as significant as they are tragic. In the early morning hours of August 2, following negotiations and promises by Iraq's dictator Saddam Hussein not to use force, a powerful Iraqi Army invaded its trusting and much weaker neighbor, Kuwait. Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act, to check that aggression. A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective--a new world order--can emerge: A new era--freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony."

In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 - "A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchs who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."

According to Cisco Wheeler, a former Illuminati mind control programmer, there are 10 million people who have been programmed as mind controlled slaves using trauma-based MC programs with names like Monarch and MK Ultra. The newer, non-trauma, electronic means of MC programming that grew out of the Montauk Project, may include millions more. Al Bielek, who played a principle role in the development of the Montauk Project, said that there likely 10 million victims of Montauk style mind control programming worldwide, the majority located in the USA. He also said that there are covert Montauk Programming 'Centers' in every major city in the U.S.

The NWO global conspirators manifest their agenda through the skillful manipulation of human emotions, especially fear. For decades, they have repeatedly utilized a contrivance that NWO researcher and author David Icke has characterized in his latest book, The Biggest Secret, as Problem, Reaction, and Solution.